Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMurugappan
dc.contributor.authorNagarajan, Ramachandran, Prof. Dr.
dc.contributor.authorSazali, Yaacob, Prof. Dr.
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-10T04:05:26Z
dc.date.available2011-06-10T04:05:26Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical and Biological Engineering, vol. 31(1), 2011, pages 45-52en_US
dc.identifier.issn1609-0985
dc.identifier.urihttp://jmbe.bme.ncku.edu.tw/index.php/bme/article/view/455/807
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.unimap.edu.my/123456789/12189
dc.descriptionLink to publisher's homepage at http://www.bmes.org.tw/en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we present human emotion assessment using electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. The combination of surface Laplacian (SL) filtering, time-frequency analysis of wavelet transform (WT) and linear classifiers are used to classify discrete emotions (happy, surprise, fear, disgust, and neutral). EEG signals were collected from 20 subjects through 62 active electrodes, which were placed over the entire scalp based on the International 10-10 system. An audio-visual (video clips) induction-based protocol was designed for evoking discrete emotions. The raw EEG signals were preprocessed through surface Laplacian filtering method and decomposed into five different EEG frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma) using WT. In this work, we used three different wavelet functions, namely: "db8", "sym8" and "coif5", for extracting the statistical features from EEG signal for classifying the emotions. In order to evaluate the efficacy of emotion classification under different sets of EEG channels, we compared the classification accuracy of the original set of channels (62 channels) with that of a reduced set of channels (24 channels). The validation of statistical features was performed using 5-fold cross validation. In this work, K nearest neighbor (KNN) outperformed linear discriminant analysis (LDA) by offering a maximum average classification rate of 83.04% on 62 channels and 79.17% on 24 channels, respectively. Finally, we present the average classification accuracy and individual classification accuracy of two different classifiers for justifying the performance of our emotion recognition system.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBiomedical Engineering Society of the R.O.C.en_US
dc.subjectElectroencephalogram (EEG)en_US
dc.subjectEmotion assessmenten_US
dc.subjectSurface laplacian filteringen_US
dc.subjectWavelet transformen_US
dc.subjectK nearest neighbor (KNN)en_US
dc.subjectLinear discriminant analysis (LDA)en_US
dc.titleCombining spatial filtering and wavelet transform for classifying human emotions using EEG Signalsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.urlmurugappan@unimap.edu.myen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record