Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNoor Ainee, Zainol
dc.contributor.authorNur Adrina Nadia, Mohamad
dc.contributor.authorAzlinda, Ghani
dc.contributor.authorMahyun, A.W.
dc.contributor.authorNabilah Aminah, Lutpi
dc.contributor.authorFarah Naemah, Mohd Saad
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-11T03:05:57Z
dc.date.available2020-02-11T03:05:57Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Engineering Research and Education, vol.11, 2019, pages 35-44.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1823-2981 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2232-1098 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/63955
dc.descriptionLink to publisher's homepage at http://jere.unimap.edu.myen_US
dc.description.abstractLandfill leachate is a complex wastewater which may give potential problems to the environment. Besides the new treatment processes that has been implemented, coagulation and flocculation treatment are considered as the most widely used method in treating landfill leachate to reach requirements specification for the discharge of leachate. Regularly, aluminium sulphate (alum) is used as a chemical coagulant to enhance the removal contaminants in this treatment process. Besides alum, ferric sulphate also shows their ability in leachate treatment. Hence, this study has been carried out to examine the comparison between both chemical coagulants in treating leachate form Padang Siding Landfill Site. The optimum pH and coagulant dosage was evaluated by a series of Jar Test experiment. In addition, the Sludge Volume Index (SVI) test also determined for the treated leachate under optimized conditions. Ferric sulphate with optimum pH 3.0 and coagulant dosage of 6000 mg/L was successfully removed of 58.9% of COD, 72.9% of turbidity and 46.1% of suspended solid. Meanwhile, alum coagulant was able to removed 69.4% of COD, 94.5% of turbidity and 84.3% of suspended solid under optimum pH 5.0 and 8000 mg/L of optimum coagulant dosage. Besides that, SVI of alum was 46. 8 mL/g and ferric sulphate gave the value of 32.5 mL/g for SVI. Hence, ferric sulphate is recommended to replace alum as a coagulant in landfill leachate treatment process since the efficiency is almost the same as alum.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP)en_US
dc.subjectLandfill leachateen_US
dc.subjectAlumen_US
dc.subjectFerric sulphateen_US
dc.subjectCoagulation-Flocculationen_US
dc.subjectWater and wastewateren_US
dc.titleUse of alum and ferric sulphate for treating landfill leachate via coagulation Process: A comparative studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://jere.unimap.edu.my
dc.contributor.urlaineezainol@unimap.edu.myen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record