Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFarah Farhana, Zainal
dc.contributor.author‪Siti Farahnabilah, Muhd Amli
dc.contributor.authorKamarudin, Hussin
dc.contributor.authorAzmi, Rahmat
dc.contributor.authorMohd Mustafa Al Bakri, Abdullah
dc.contributorCenter of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), School of Materials Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP)en_US
dc.contributorFaculty of Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP)en_US
dc.date2022
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-07T08:31:52Z
dc.date.available2022-03-07T08:31:52Z
dc.date.issued2017-06
dc.identifier.citationIOP Conference Services: Material Sciences Engineering, vol.209, 2017, 7 pagesen_US
dc.identifier.issn1757-899x (online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/74589
dc.descriptionLink to publisher's homepage at https://iopscience.iop.org/en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents the results of corrosion studies between Fly Ash Geopolymer (FG) paste and Fly Ash-Slag Geopolymer (FSG) paste. Geopolymer was made from aluminosilicate inorganic polymers mixed with the alkaline activator in order to reduce the carbon dioxide (CO₂) to the ecosystem. Samples then were cured at 60ºC for 24 hours in the oven. Reinforcement bar is placed at the center of the paste. The samples were examined after 7, 14 and 28 days in terms of Open Circuit Potential (OCP) test, phase analysis and morphology analysis. The potential values regarding OCP test for FSG paste from 7 days until 28 days are 0.464 V, 0.474 V and 0.498 V more positive than FG paste which the potential values are 0.087 V, 0.133 V and 0.206 V respectively. From the Pourbaix diagram, all the potential values for FG paste and FSG paste were located in the same Fe₂O₃, passivity region. Passive layer which is the oxide form exists in this region to protect the reinforcement bar from corrosion agents. It can be proved from phase analysis results which iron oxide hydroxide (FeOOH), hematite (Fe₂O₃) and magnetite (Fe₃O₄) peaks exist. The differences of morphological structures of these pastes were observed by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). It shows that FSG paste had good corrosion resistance and low corrosion rate compared to FG paste.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIOP Publishing Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Conference on Innovative Research (ICIR Euroinvent 2017);
dc.subject.otherGeopolymersen_US
dc.subject.otherFly ashen_US
dc.subject.otherFly ash geopolymer (FG)en_US
dc.subject.otherFly ash-slag geopolymer (FSG)en_US
dc.titleCorrosion studies of fly ash and fly ash-slag based geopolymeren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/209/1/012026
dc.contributor.urlfarahfarhana@unimap.edu.myen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record