Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLian-Yee, Kok
dc.contributor.authorChen-Soon, Chee
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Muhammad Taufiq Abdullah
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-21T07:22:39Z
dc.date.available2020-09-21T07:22:39Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationMovement, Health & Exercise (MoHE), vol.9(2), 2020, pages 71-84en_US
dc.identifier.issn2600-9404
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/67412
dc.descriptionLink to publisher's homepage at http://www.mohejournal.com/index.php/moheen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The efficacy of SSGs has been difficult to assess as researchers have used a wide-ranging number of players, pitch dimensions and game rules, making comparisons complicated. Therefore, this study compared four SSG rules [one (SSG1T), two (SSG2T), three (SSG3T), and unlimited touches (SSGFT)] on time spent in different heart-rate (HR) intensity zones, frequency of technical actions and distance covered involving the starting 11 players and the reserve goalkeeper of a national soccer league team. Methods: The participants (age: 24.3±4.0 yr; height: 171.2±5.9 cm: weight: 61.9±7.4 kg) were measured for previously mentioned dependent variables during each SSG format. Results: Analysis found no significant difference among the four SSGs formats [F(3, 27) = 2.897, p = .053] for time spent in the low-intensity zone, but significant differences were observed for time spent in moderate [F(3, 27) = 13.642, p = .001] and high [F(3, 27) = 13.431, p = .001] intensity zones. Significantly more time was spent in the high intensity zone [F(3, 27) = 13.431, p = .001] when players performed SSG2T and SSGFT when compared SSG1T (p = .002 and p = .009) respectively. SSG1T induced most unsuccessful passing [F(3,27) = 500.498, p = .001] but no differences was observed among SSG2T, SSG3T and SSGFT. SSG2T, SSG3T and SSG3T obtained significantly more shots on goal shots on goal [F(3,27) = 25.398, p = .001], with SSGFT achieving higher numbers than the other three formats. There were no significant differences in goals scored (p = .537) and distance covered (p = 0.574) for all SSG formats. Conclusion: The main findings of this study revealed that all four SSG formats stimulated moderate to high heart rate intensities that could induce positive aerobic and anaerobic adaptations depending on frequency of technical actions and players’ skill level. Therefore, coaches could select specific SSG formats to help players achieved intended intensity and technical objectives programmed for different phases of periodized training.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKementerian Pendidikan Tinggi (KPT), Malaysiaen_US
dc.subjectGames trainingen_US
dc.subjectRule changesen_US
dc.subjectIntensityen_US
dc.subjectSoccer skillsen_US
dc.subjectFitnessen_US
dc.titleEffect of small-sided games rule changes on time spent in different intensity zones, frequency of technical actions and distance covered during soccer trainingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.urllian@upm.edu.myen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record