Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/39165
Title: Comparison of natural coarse aggregate and recycled coarse aggregate in concrete
Authors: Khairul Muzzamil, Azmi
Roshazita Che Amat
Keywords: Demolition waste
Natural coarse aggregate (NCA)
Recycled coarse aggregate (RCA)
Concrete
Issue Date: Jun-2013
Publisher: Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP)
Abstract: As a developing country, construction is the one of main incomes producing in Malaysia. Huge amount of demolition waste were produced from these activities. In Malaysia, the construction waste has cause a significant impact on the environmental and also increasing trend. These demolition wastes are disposal illegally or disposed at landfill. This research to identify and compared the properties of natural coarse aggregate (NCA) and recycled coarse aggregate (RCA). Three mixes of concrete with target compressive cube strength ranging at 20 MPa were cast using recycled aggregate (RA) and one mixed for natural aggregate (NA). For this study, the percentage of RCA in concrete mix is 50%, 70% and 100%. To get the different of both aggregates, analysis such as particle size analysis, slump test, water absorption and compressive strength are provided. From the results shown that concrete mix NA have more strength than RA, water absorption of RA higher than NA, workability of NA higher than RA and lastly water absorption of RA higher than NA. For conclusion in this research based on the results from analysis, the percentages of RA suitable to use in concrete mix are 70% and fulfil the standard in concrete.
Description: Access is limited to UniMAP community.
URI: http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/39165
Appears in Collections:School of Environmental Engineering (FYP)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Abstract, Acknowledgement.pdf207.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Introduction.pdf216.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Literature review.pdf209.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Methodology.pdf271.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Results and discussion.pdf357.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Conclusion.pdf195.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Reference and appendix.pdf205.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in UniMAP Library Digital Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.