Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmirul Mukminin, Ramalan
dc.contributor.authorMohd Faridz, Ahmad
dc.contributor.authorSiti Jameelah, Md Japilus
dc.contributor.authorJamilah, Ahmad Radzi
dc.contributor.authorSyed Shahbudin, Syed Omar
dc.contributorFaculty of Sports Science and Recreation, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Perlis, Malaysiaen_US
dc.creatorAhmad Fikri, Mohd Kassim
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-08T10:52:16Z
dc.date.available2022-12-08T10:52:16Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-11
dc.identifier.citationMovement, Health & Exercise (MoHE), vol.11(1), 2022, pages 15-22en_US
dc.identifier.issn2231-9409 (printed)
dc.identifier.issn2289-9510 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/77483
dc.descriptionLink to publisher's homepage at https://www.mohejournal.org/aboutus.aspen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Coaching effectiveness leads to successful athletes, including athlete’s development and performance, positive psychological progress and athlete outcomes. The coach–athlete relationship referred to all the conditions where the feelings, thoughts and behaviours of coach and athlete are mutually and casually related to each other. While, anxiety is an experience of an unpleasant athlete’s psychological and physiological feeling. However, the existing literature on the influence of coaching effectiveness and the coach–athlete relationship does not investigate specifically competitive anxiety. Aims and Objectives: This current study aims to investigated athletes’ perception of coaching effectiveness, coach–athletes’ relationship and competitive anxiety experience of the athletes. Methods: One hundred and fifty-two (n = 152) athletes from various team sports completed a questionnaire pack assessing the study variables. The coaching effectiveness scale, coach–athlete relationship questionnaire and competitive state anxiety inventory-2 were used as an instrument for this study. Results: Results revealed that there were significant correlations between all the factors of coaching effectiveness and all the factors of the coach–athlete relationship. However, the anxiety assessment indicated a positive, negative significant correlation with the factors of coaching effectiveness and factors of the coach–athlete relationship. Further, there were no significant differences among all the factors of coaching effectiveness between genders except ‘technique effectiveness’. Next, there were no significant differences in the coach–athlete relationship between genders except for ‘commitment’. However, results revealed that there were significant differences in anxiety assessment except ‘cognitive anxiety’ between genders. Conclusion: The competitive anxiety experience of athletes the performance of the athletes is based on how effective their coaches to influence the athletes and how they work together. Thus, do coaching effectiveness and coach–athlete relationship stand out as the fundamental factors in issues of athlete’s anxiety? It might be yes as the effectiveness of the coach and relationship with the athletes is the main causes that determine the enthusiasm of a team and the athlete’s confidence.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKementerian Pendidikan Tinggi (KPT), Malaysiaen_US
dc.subject.otherCoach–athlete relationshipen_US
dc.subject.otherTeam sportsen_US
dc.subject.otherYouthen_US
dc.subject.otherCoaching effectivenessen_US
dc.subject.otherCompetitive state anxiety inventory–2en_US
dc.titleCoaching effectiveness and coach–athlete relationship model offers possibilities solution for competitive anxiety of young athletesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.urlahmadfikri@uitm.edu.myen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record