dc.contributor.author | Mohd Zakimi, Zakaria | |
dc.contributor.author | Hishamuddin, Jamaluddin | |
dc.contributor.author | Robiah, Ahmad | |
dc.contributor.author | Azmi, Harun | |
dc.contributor.author | Radhwan, Hussin | |
dc.contributor.author | Ahmad Nabil, Mohd Khalil | |
dc.contributor.author | Muhammad Khairy, Md Naim | |
dc.contributor.author | Ahmad Faizal, Annuar | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-10-25T06:55:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-10-25T06:55:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-09-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Jurnal Teknologi, vol.75 (11), 2015, pages 77-90 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2180-3722 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/43797 | |
dc.description | Link to publisher's homepage at http://www.jurnalteknologi.utm.my | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents perturbation parameters for tuning of multi-objective optimization differential evolution and its application to dynamic system modeling. The perturbation of the proposed algorithm was composed of crossover and mutation operators. Initially, a set of parameter values was tuned vigorously by executing multiple runs of algorithm for each proposed parameter variation. A set of values for crossover and mutation rates were proposed in executing the algorithm for model structure selection in dynamic system modeling. The model structure selection was one of the procedures in the system identification technique. Most researchers focused on the problem in selecting the parsimony model as the best represented the dynamic systems. Therefore, this problem needed two objective functions to overcome it, i.e. minimum predictive error and model complexity. One of the main problems in identification of dynamic systems is to select the minimal model from the huge possible models that need to be considered. Hence, the important concepts in selecting good and adequate model used in the proposed algorithm were elaborated, including the implementation of the algorithm for modeling dynamic systems. Besides, the results showed that multi-objective optimization differential evolution performed better with tuned perturbation parameters. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Penerbit UTM Press | en_US |
dc.subject | Differential evolution | en_US |
dc.subject | Model structure selection | en_US |
dc.subject | Multi-objective optimization | en_US |
dc.subject | NSGA-II | en_US |
dc.subject | System identification | en_US |
dc.title | Perturbation parameters tuning of multi-objective optimization differential evolution and its application to dynamic system modeling | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5335 | |