Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNizam Uddin, Ahamed
dc.contributor.authorSundaraj, Kenneth, Assoc. Prof. Dr.
dc.contributor.authorR. Badlishah, Ahmad, Prof. Dr.
dc.contributor.authorMatiur, Rahman
dc.contributor.authorMd. Asraf, Ali
dc.contributor.authorMd. Anamul, Islam
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-01T15:25:06Z
dc.date.available2014-04-01T15:25:06Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationBiomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering, vol. 58(5), 2013, pages 475-488en_US
dc.identifier.issn1862-278X (Online)
dc.identifier.issn0013-5585 (Print)
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/dspace/handle/123456789/33333
dc.descriptionLink to publisher's homepage at http://www.degruyter.com/en_US
dc.description.abstractSurface electromyography (SEMG) has been widely used to analyze the biceps brachii (BB) muscle during voluntary contraction, and the effect of the interelectrode distance has been studied. However, the effect of anthropometric variations and the placement of electrodes on the BB activity during arm wrestling (i.e., during isometric contraction at a submaximal intensity) has seldom been investigated. In this study, the BB strength throughout this type of static contraction was evaluated. The SEMG signals were recorded from three locations on the BB: the muscle belly (M), near proximal (P), and distal tendon (L) regions. Twenty subjects who participated in the experiment were divided into five groups (A, B, C, D, and E). The average SEMG, root mean square, and variability of the signal were calculated using the coefficient of variance. The results indicated that the M region was more active and exhibited increased signal consistency (10.91%) compared with the other two regions (P: 24.47% and L: 19.13%). Significant differences were observed between the L and P regions and between the M and P regions (p<0.05); however, there were no differences between the M and L regions (p>0.05). The increase in the SEMG value in groups B and C was significant (p<0.05), whereas groups A, D, and E did not exhibit a significant increase (p>0.05). In addition, muscle size was the strongest predictor of strength compared with body weight and height. The results suggest that the M region displays considerable SEMG effects and signal reliability. Furthermore, the SEMG measurements were found to correlate strongly with the strength of the contractions and the muscle size, and not with weight and height.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyteren_US
dc.subjectAnthropometricen_US
dc.subjectArm wrestlingen_US
dc.subjectBiceps brachiien_US
dc.subjectElectrodeen_US
dc.subjectElectromyographyen_US
dc.subjectIsometric contractionen_US
dc.titleEffects of anthropometric variables and electrode placement on the SEMG activity of the biceps brachii muscle during submaximal isometric contraction in arm wrestlingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2013-0005
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bmte.2013.58.issue-5/bmt-2013-0005/bmt-2013-0005.xml
dc.contributor.urlahamed1557@hotmail.comen_US
dc.contributor.urlkenneth@unimap.edu.myen_US
dc.contributor.urlbadli@unimap.edu.myen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record