dc.contributor.author | Rose Emmy, Kelbin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-04-23T03:24:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-04-23T03:24:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-05 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.unimap.edu.my/123456789/24430 | |
dc.description | Access is limited to UniMAP community. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The study of this paper is to compare the rebound hammer (RH) number with
compression testing machine. The result of RH towards compressive strength of the
concrete with surface finishes by tile and mortar placed on it also being study. Concrete
with it cement was replaced by metakaolin(MK) and limestone about 50% also had
been evaluated it strength by RH. 54 samples was prepared and tested. 27 samples tested
during the 7 days and the other 27 was tested for 28 days strength by RH and
compression testing machine. The result of the RH number and compression testing
machine was compared. It was found that the RH number cannot be directly used as the
compressive strength value. However a correlation can be made and obtained by an
equation. Compressive strength of concrete can be obtained by the rebound value with
an equation which used to correct the rebound hammer number and give the
compressive strength value. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) | en_US |
dc.subject | Rebound hammer (RH) | en_US |
dc.subject | Concrete | en_US |
dc.subject | Metakaolin (MK) | en_US |
dc.subject | Limestone | en_US |
dc.title | Strength comparison of concrete with surface finishes and cement replacement by rebound hammer (RH) and compression machine | en_US |
dc.type | Learning Object | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Mokhzani Khair Ishak | en_US |
dc.publisher.department | School of Environmental Engineering | en_US |