• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Final Year Project Papers & Reports
    • School of Environmental Engineering (FYP)
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Final Year Project Papers & Reports
    • School of Environmental Engineering (FYP)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparison of slope remediation method on slope stability of man-made slope

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Abstract, Acknowledgement.pdf (266.9Kb)
    Introduction.pdf (800.7Kb)
    Literature Review.pdf (1.012Mb)
    Methodology.pdf (633.7Kb)
    Results and Discussion.pdf (574.7Kb)
    Conclusion.pdf (230.1Kb)
    References and Appendices.pdf (6.263Mb)
    Date
    2015-06
    Author
    Amirul Arif, Othman
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This research discuss about the comparison of slope remediation method on slope stability of man-made slope. This research includes identifying the soil characteristics on the affected slope, evaluation slope stability based on factor of safety (FOS) and cost consumption of remediation method. Soil nailing and cantilever retaining wall had been proposed and tested using slope simulation. In cantilever retaining wall, two backfill materials also had been proposed, using sand and glass. Retaining wall with size 2 m x 0.5 m at base and 3.5 m of height had been designed in slope simulation and fill by concrete. Meanwhile, soil nailing had been designed by different length, which is 4.5 m, 5.0 m, 5.5 m, 6.0 m, 6.5 m and 7.0 m, diameter of steel is 0.025 m. Among these methods, the result obtained from evaluation of FOS before and after remedial process had been analysed. When sand use as a backfill material, the value of FOS for cantilever retaining wall shows 1.214 without existence of pore water pressure (PWP), meanwhile 1.215 for existence of PWP. Meanwhile uses of glass shows 1.532 and 1.533 without the presence of PWP and with the presence PWP respectively. Soil nailing shows that 1.402 and 1.319 when without the presence of PWP and presence of PWP respectively. Cost consumption for remedial process is RM30, 006.50 for retaining wall and RM41, 423.80 for soil nailing. From that, it can be concluded that sand is a good backfill material, meanwhile soil nailing depends on strength and length of steel. Glass can be proposed in backfill material in future. Strength and length of soil nailing steel needed for improvise to increase the soil nailing capability to achieve FOS value 1.5 and above.
    URI
    http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/82846
    Collections
    • School of Environmental Engineering (FYP) [638]

    Atmire NV

    Perpustakaan Tuanku Syed Faizuddin Putra (PTSFP) | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of UniMAP Library Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Atmire NV

    Perpustakaan Tuanku Syed Faizuddin Putra (PTSFP) | Send Feedback