Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZulkarnay, Zakaria
dc.contributor.authorIbrahim, Balkhis
dc.contributor.authorLee, Pick Yern
dc.contributor.authorNor Muzakkir, Nor Ayob
dc.contributor.authorMohd Hafiz, Fazalul Rahiman, Dr.
dc.contributor.authorMohd Zikrillah, Zawahirah
dc.contributor.authorRuzairi, Abdul Rahim, Prof. Dr.
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-25T03:20:22Z
dc.date.available2015-05-25T03:20:22Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationJurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), vol. 69(8), 2014, pages 65-70en_US
dc.identifier.issn0127-9696 (P)
dc.identifier.issn2180-3722 (O)
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.jurnalteknologi.utm.my/index.php/jurnalteknologi/article/view/3298
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/39949
dc.descriptionLink to publisher's homepage at http://www.penerbit.utm.my/en_US
dc.description.abstractMagnetic induction tomography is a new non-invasive technology, based on eddy current discovery of electromagnetic induction by Michael Faraday. Through this technique, the passive electrical properties distribution of an object can be obtained by the use of image reconstruction algorithm implemented in this system. There are many types of image reconstruction that have been developed for this modality, however in this paper only two algorithms discussed, Linear Back Projection and Eminent Pixel Reconstruction. Linear Back Projection algorithm is the most basic type of image reconstruction. It is the simplest and fast algorithm out of all types of algorithms, whereas Eminent Pixel Reconstruction algorithm is an improved algorithm which provided better images and has been implemented in other modalities such as optical tomography. This paper has implemented Eminent Pixel Reconstruction in magnetic induction tomography applications and the performance is compared to Linear Back Projection based on the simulation of the fourteen types of simulated phantoms of homogenous and isotropic conductivity property. It was found that Eminent Pixel Reconstruction has produced better images relative to Linear Back Projection, however the images are still poor when the objects are located near to the excitation coil or sensor and it is worse when the distance between objects are near to each other.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPenerbit UTM Pressen_US
dc.subjectImage reconstruction algorithmen_US
dc.subjectIsotropicen_US
dc.subjectLow conductivityen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic inductionen_US
dc.subjectTomographyen_US
dc.titleSimulative study of two-phase homogenous and isotropic media imaging using magnetic induction tomographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.urlzulkarnay@unimap.edu.myen_US
dc.contributor.urlIbrahim_balkhis@gmail.comen_US
dc.contributor.urlpickyern_88@yahoo.comen_US
dc.contributor.urlnormuzakkir@gmail.comen_US
dc.contributor.urlhafiz@unimap.edu.myen_US
dc.contributor.urlruzairi@fke.utm.myen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record