dc.contributor.author | Fahmi, Muhammad Ridwan | |
dc.contributor.author | Wataru, Nishijima | |
dc.contributor.author | Mitsumasa, Okada | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-12-03T08:18:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-12-03T08:18:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Chemosphere, vol.50 (8), 2003, pages 1043-1048 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0045-6535 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/44336 | |
dc.description | Link to publisher's homepage at http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The single and multi-stages advanced oxidation process (AOP)-biological treatments were evaluated to apply for drinking water treatment, especially for the water containing less susceptible dissolved organic carbon (DOC) to ozone, comparing with the ozonation-biological treatment. Minaga reservoir water and the secondary effluent from a Municipal wastewater treatment plant were used as dissolved organic matter (DOM) solutions. DOC removals after 60 min AOP-biological treatment were 62% and 41% in the Minaga reservoir water and the secondary effluent, respectively, whereas those in the ozonation-biological treatment only 40% and 15% of DOC were removed, respectively. The result indicated that the single-stage AOP-biological treatment could improve DOC removal in comparison with the single-stage ozonation-biological treatment. This is because the AOP mineralized both biodegradable dissolved organic carbon (BDOC) produced in the early stage of oxidation and non-biodegradable dissolved organic carbon (NBDOC), whereas only BDOC was mineralized by further ozonation and NBDOC was not oxidized in the ozonation-biological treatment. The multi-stage treatment could not improve DOC removal in comparison with the single-stage treatment in the ozonation-biological treatment for the secondary effluent containing less susceptible DOC to ozone. However, the multi-stage AOP-biological treatment significantly reduced DOC and achieved 71% of DOC removal by 4 times repetition of 15 min oxidation, whereas DOC removal was 41% in the single-stage AOP-biological treatment for the same oxidation time. The improvement of DOC removal by the multi-stage AOP-biological treatment was due to BDOC removal as a radical scavenger by subsequent biological treatment in the early stage of oxidation and direct mineralization in the latter stage of oxidation. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier B.V. | en_US |
dc.subject | Advanced oxidation process | en_US |
dc.subject | Biodegradable dissolved organic carbon | en_US |
dc.subject | Biological treatment | en_US |
dc.subject | Multi-stage treatment | en_US |
dc.subject | Ozonation | en_US |
dc.title | Improvement of DOC removal by multi-stage AOP-biological treatment | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.url | http://www.journals.elsevier.com/chemosphere | |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00617-3 | |
dc.contributor.url | drfahmi@unimap.edu.my | en_US |