Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKuok, King Kuok, Ir. Dr.
dc.contributor.authorSobri, Harun, Prof. Madya Dr.
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Po Chan
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-28T00:58:40Z
dc.date.available2012-04-28T00:58:40Z
dc.date.issued2011-12
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of the Institution of Engineers, Malaysia, vol. 72(4), 2011, pages 1-5en_US
dc.identifier.issn0126-513X
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.myiem.org.my/content/iem_journal_2011-306.aspx
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.unimap.edu.my/123456789/18973
dc.descriptionLink to publisher's homepage at http://www.myiem.org.my/en_US
dc.description.abstractHydrological Tank model has proven more capable than many other models in modeling the hydrologic responses from a wide range of humid watershed. Many hydrologists are using this model due to its simplicity of concept and computation while achieving forecasting accuracy comparable with more sophisticated models. Throughout the years, various types of Tank model have been developed. The best was found to be storages series type. However, there is no general agreement regarding the best number of series storage tanks for rural catchment in humid region. In this study, three types of series storage tanks were selected to model the daily and hourly runoff for Bedup Basin, a rural catchment in humid region. These three Tank models that consist of three, four and five series storages tanks are named as 3-Tank-D, 4-Tank-D, 5-Tank-D respectively for daily model, and 3-Tank-H, 4-Tank-H, 5-Tank-H respectively for hourly model. The model performance is evaluated with coefficient of correlation (R) and Nash-sutcliffe coefficient (E2). Results revealed that the best number of tank is four, where average R and E2 yield to 0.6833 and 0.6620 respectively for daily runoff simulation, 0.8985 and 0.8214 respectively for hourly runoff simulation. Besides, sensitivity analysis also demonstrated the infiltration coefficient from forth to fifth tank (C9) has minor impact to runoff peak discharge and side outlet coefficient for fifth tank (C10) doesn’t have any significant impact to runoff peak discharge for both daily and hourly runoff simulation. Thus, these two parameters can be ignored. This result further confirmed that the best number of tanks for daily and hourly runoff simulation for rural catchment in humid region is four.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe Institution of Engineers, Malaysia (IEM)en_US
dc.subjectCoefficient of correlation (R)en_US
dc.subjectConceptual rainfall-runoff model (CRR)en_US
dc.subjectHydrological Tank modelen_US
dc.subjectNash-sutcliffe coefficient (E2)en_US
dc.titleInvestigation best number of tanks for hydrological tank model for rural catchment in humid regionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.urlkelvinkuok100@gmail.comen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record