Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/82846
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAmirul Arif, Othman-
dc.contributorSchool of Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.date2023-04-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T00:21:50Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-03T00:21:50Z-
dc.date.issued2015-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/82846-
dc.descriptionAccess is limited to UniMAP communityen_US
dc.description.abstractThis research discuss about the comparison of slope remediation method on slope stability of man-made slope. This research includes identifying the soil characteristics on the affected slope, evaluation slope stability based on factor of safety (FOS) and cost consumption of remediation method. Soil nailing and cantilever retaining wall had been proposed and tested using slope simulation. In cantilever retaining wall, two backfill materials also had been proposed, using sand and glass. Retaining wall with size 2 m x 0.5 m at base and 3.5 m of height had been designed in slope simulation and fill by concrete. Meanwhile, soil nailing had been designed by different length, which is 4.5 m, 5.0 m, 5.5 m, 6.0 m, 6.5 m and 7.0 m, diameter of steel is 0.025 m. Among these methods, the result obtained from evaluation of FOS before and after remedial process had been analysed. When sand use as a backfill material, the value of FOS for cantilever retaining wall shows 1.214 without existence of pore water pressure (PWP), meanwhile 1.215 for existence of PWP. Meanwhile uses of glass shows 1.532 and 1.533 without the presence of PWP and with the presence PWP respectively. Soil nailing shows that 1.402 and 1.319 when without the presence of PWP and presence of PWP respectively. Cost consumption for remedial process is RM30, 006.50 for retaining wall and RM41, 423.80 for soil nailing. From that, it can be concluded that sand is a good backfill material, meanwhile soil nailing depends on strength and length of steel. Glass can be proposed in backfill material in future. Strength and length of soil nailing steel needed for improvise to increase the soil nailing capability to achieve FOS value 1.5 and above.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP)en_US
dc.subject.otherSlope stabilityen_US
dc.subject.otherSlopeen_US
dc.subject.otherSlope remediation methoden_US
dc.subject.otherSoil nailingen_US
dc.titleComparison of slope remediation method on slope stability of man-made slopeen_US
dc.typeLearning Objecten_US
dc.contributor.advisorZuhayr Md Ghazaly-
Appears in Collections:School of Environmental Engineering (FYP)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Abstract, Acknowledgement.pdf266.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Introduction.pdf800.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Literature Review.pdf1.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Methodology.pdf633.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Results and Discussion.pdf574.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Conclusion.pdf230.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
References and Appendices.pdf6.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in UniMAP Library Digital Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.