Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/61631
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOnwaree Ingkatecha-
dc.contributor.authorSirirat Hirunrat-
dc.contributor.authorBavornrat Vanadurongwan-
dc.contributor.authorSakesan Tongkhambanchong-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-06T06:38:16Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-06T06:38:16Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationMovement, Health & Exercise (MoHE), vol.8(2), 2019, pages 17-29en_US
dc.identifier.issn2231-9409 (Print)-
dc.identifier.issn2600-9404 (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/61631-
dc.descriptionLink to publisher's homepage at http://www.mohejournal.com/index.php/moheen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the range of motion changes and force production for running footwear with and without windlass enhancing feature, and barefoot, on the lower extremities during late stance phase of running. Fourteen healthy recreational rearfoot male runners (age 20.14+0.66 years, height 171.79+4.66 cm, and body weight 64.56+5.79 kg.) were recruited. Three-dimensional movement analysis and force production were collected by a motion analysis system and AMTI force platform, and the data were calculated and analysed by Visual 3D. The participants, barefoot and two types of footwear, namely running footwear with and without windlass enhancing feature, started to run along the runway with speed at 3.5 m/s (range between 3.33-3.68 m/s) for three trials in each condition. The repeated measures analysis of variance was used for analysis. A Bonferroni post hoc test was conducted between conditions (p < .01). The results revealed that the ankle movement barefoot and with the running footwear without windlass enhancing feature were significantly different from the running footwear with the windlass enhancing feature at the beginning, but that of barefoot was significantly different from the running footwear with and without windlass enhancing feature at the end of the late stance phase. The forefoot’s range of motion barefoot and with the running footwear without windlass enhancing feature was significantly different from the running footwear with the windlass enhancing feature, but the vertical ground reaction forces of the running footwear with and without windlass enhancing feature were not significantly different. Significant difference was found between barefoot and running footwear with the windlass enhancing feature in force production. In conclusion, the running footwear without windlass enhancing feature offers more flexible forefoot movements, close to barefoot, but the propulsion is still the same as the running footwear with the windlass enhancing feature.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKementerian Pendidikan Tinggi (KPT), Malaysiaen_US
dc.subjectWindlass enhancing featureen_US
dc.subjectRunningen_US
dc.subjectPropulsive stance phaseen_US
dc.subjectKinematicsen_US
dc.subjectKineticsen_US
dc.titleEffects of Windlass Enhancing Feature on Kinematics and Kinetics During Propulsive Stance Phase of Runningen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.urlonwaree.i@gmail.comen_US
Appears in Collections:Movement, Health and Exercise (MoHE)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
EFFECTS OF WINDLASS ENHANCING FEATURE ON KINEMATICS.pdf736.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in UniMAP Library Digital Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.