Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/61628
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMohd Hafiz, Muhd Ghoth-
dc.contributor.authorNurul Hidayah, Amir-
dc.contributor.authorJamilah, Ahmad Radzi-
dc.contributor.authorEllail Ain, Mohd Aznan-
dc.contributor.authorSiti Jameelah, Md Japilus-
dc.contributor.authorMuhammad Yusri, Mohd Ramle-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-06T06:37:19Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-06T06:37:19Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationMovement, Health & Exercise (MoHE), vol.8(2), 2019, pages 67-80en_US
dc.identifier.issn2231-9409 (Print)-
dc.identifier.issn2600-9404 (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/61628-
dc.descriptionLink to publisher's homepage at http://www.mohejournal.com/index.php/moheen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of cold water immersion (CWI) and progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) on DOMS markers among young athletes. A total of 30 young athletes with mean age of 18.57 ± .504 years old, weight 61.92 ± 7.96 kg and height 170.67 ±7.57 cm volunteered to participate in this study. Participants were required to perform 20 reps x 5 sets drop jump (DJ) to induce muscle damage. They were randomly assigned into three groups: CWI (n = 10), PMR (n = 10) and control group (n = 10). Immediately following damage-inducing exercise protocol, CWI group were required to submerge lower body until iliac crest level in 15°C±1°C of cold water for 16 minutes; whereas control group applied the same position without immersed in cold water for 16 minutes. Perceived muscle soreness, range of motion (ROM) thigh circumference and the 20 meter sprint have been used as DOMS markers in this study. Markers were measured pre-exercise, post-exercise, post-intervention, and after 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 96 hours. The results of mixed ANOVA revealed a significant interaction (p < 0.05) in 20-meter sprint between groups and measurements at 24 hours and post-interventions, respectively. Conversely, no significant interactions were found in perceived muscle soreness, ROM and thigh circumference (p > 0.05). In conclusion, a single bout of CWI and PMR are not beneficial to elicit positive effects on DOMS markers used in this study.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKementerian Pendidikan Tinggi (KPT), Malaysiaen_US
dc.subjectCold water immersionen_US
dc.subjectDelayed-onset muscle sorenessen_US
dc.subjectProgressive muscle relaxationen_US
dc.subjectYoung athletesen_US
dc.titleComparison between two recovery methods: cold water immersion versus progressive muscle relaxation in reducing doms among young athletesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.urlhidayah131@perlis.uitm.edu.myen_US
Appears in Collections:Movement, Health and Exercise (MoHE)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparison between two recovery methods.pdf329 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in UniMAP Library Digital Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.