Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/40696
Title: Properties comparison between ordinary portland cement (OPC) and palm oil fuel ash (POFA) concrete reinforcement
Authors: Muhammad Rudzwan, Omar
Liyana Ahmad Sofri
Keywords: Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC)
Palm Oil Fuel Ash (POFA)
Agriculture waste
Oil palm waste
Issue Date: Jun-2014
Publisher: Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP)
Abstract: The increase in the production of palm oil had caused existence of problem in oil palm dust disposal in Malaysia that is world's largest exporter. Realizing effect of this problem, various solutions raised to overcome this matter and among them is by reuse waste material (POFA) for use in construction field. Several studies were being conducted on palm oil fuel ash and this waste seen potentially to be applied to replace Portland cement. In this study, oil palm (POFA) waste production effectiveness named oil palm dust studied to know replacement percentage that is most optimal and strength that is achievable by a concrete sample which contain POFA mixture. Reinforced concrete used in POFA sample testing to know effect of the material used in real structure building. Several tests were made on POFA sample namely slump test on wet concrete, compression test, flexural test that were carried out on beam sample, water absorption test, and pull out test. From all tests that have done, concrete sample which contains POFA have lower strength compared to plain concrete (OPC). On the other hand, cement replacement by 10% POFA shows highest record strength that is achievable compared to POFA mixture 30% and 50% in 28 day age. POFA nature that more absorb water compared to cement cause chemical reaction affected and influence concrete strength.
Description: Access is limited to UniMAP community.
URI: http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/40696
Appears in Collections:School of Environmental Engineering (FYP)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Abstract, Acknowledgement.pdf92.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Introduction.pdf85.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Literature review.pdf176.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Methodology.pdf1.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Results and discussion.pdf593.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Conclusion.pdf81.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
References and appendix.pdf13.58 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in UniMAP Library Digital Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.