Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.unimap.edu.my:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/13732
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIqraz, Nabi Khan, Prof.-
dc.contributor.authorSwami, Saran, Prof.-
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-13T05:11:57Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-13T05:11:57Z-
dc.date.issued2007-06-
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of the Institution of Engineers, Malaysia, vol. 68(2), 2007, pages 28-35en_US
dc.identifier.issn0126-513X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://myiem.org.my/content/iem_journal_2007-178.aspx-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.unimap.edu.my/123456789/13732-
dc.descriptionLink to publisher's homepage at http://www.myiem.org.my/en_US
dc.description.abstractThe usefulness of the patented reinforced earth wall of Vidal, where reinforcement is attached with the skin panels, has been proved beyond doubt but under certain circumstances a conventional retaining wall with reinforced backfill may appear more appropriate. Keeping in view this fact, a model study has been conducted to observe the effect of reinforcing the backfill. Earth pressure on 1.0 m high model wall was monitored and pressure due to unreinforced backfill was compared to the pressure due to reinforced backfill. Different lengths of bamboo strips and geogrids were used for strengthening the backfill. Observations for the rotation of wall and corresponding base moment were recorded. These results were used to verify a theoretical analysis developed for inclined retaining wall having reinforced backfill with uniformly distributed surcharge load. The analysis was used to develop non-dimensional charts for designing retaining walls with reinforced backfill. The analysis was applicable for both strip and mat type reinforcements. Results indicated decrease in moments up to about 65 percent due to reinforcing the backfill. The observed moments were less than the corresponding theoretical moments. It may be due to side-wall friction of test tank which seems to have prevented the full development of failure wedge. There is no significant decrease in earth pressure where Dp value is greater than 1.0 and L/H value greater than 0.6.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe Institution of Engineers, Malaysiaen_US
dc.subjectConventional retaining wall with reinforced backfillen_US
dc.subjectReinforced earthen_US
dc.subjectUnattached reinforcementen_US
dc.titleA model study on retaining wall with reinforced backfillen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.urliqraz56@yahoo.co.inen_US
Appears in Collections:IEM Journal

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
028-035_A Model Study(8).pdf1.66 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in UniMAP Library Digital Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.